William F. Hayden Park Plan

Share William F. Hayden Park Plan on Facebook Share William F. Hayden Park Plan on X (formerly Twitter) Share William F. Hayden Park Plan on Linkedin Email William F. Hayden Park Plan link
William F. Hayden Park

Join the Community Conversation

October 5, 2026 Update: Thank you to the thousands of community members, park users, stakeholders, and partners who have participated throughout the 18-month planning process for William F. Hayden Park.

The project team has now reached the 95% plan stage for public review before the plan is finalized and considered by City Council for adoption later this year.

Review the William F. Hayden Draft Plan (pdf) and take the draft plan survey by Monday, October 19 to let us know if the plan meets the identified community goals. View the appendices under Plan Documents.


>>

Join the Community Conversation

October 5, 2026 Update: Thank you to the thousands of community members, park users, stakeholders, and partners who have participated throughout the 18-month planning process for William F. Hayden Park.

The project team has now reached the 95% plan stage for public review before the plan is finalized and considered by City Council for adoption later this year.

Review the William F. Hayden Draft Plan (pdf) and take the draft plan survey by Monday, October 19 to let us know if the plan meets the identified community goals. View the appendices under Plan Documents.


>>Take the Survey


2nd Public Survey Results

The results are in! View the public survey results and neighborhood survey results for the William F. Hayden Plan. Did you miss the final survey for the plan? No problem, you can review the survey information and draft Trails Concept Plan (large file) and ask a question of the project team. The draft plan will be posted later this fall for additional community feedback. Be sure to subscribe to the page for updates.

Project Background

Elevate your everyday at William F. Hayden Park, Lakewood's popular regional park destination providing access to nature and an opportunity get outdoors and take in the views! Join us for a community conversation to better understand the park's wildlife and natural resources while gaining valuable insight into what park visitors love and what they would like to see improved.

Managed by the City of Lakewood, the park is beginning a comprehensive planning process that will include an assessment of park visitor needs, an evaluation of park trails and infrastructure, environmental review, recreation management, and design work for future park and trail improvements. These will be packaged into an implementable action plan to serve visitors for the next decade. The city hired DHM Design to lead the projected 12-month planning effort, which will include an extensive public engagement process with park visitors and stakeholders.

About William F. Hayden Park

With more than 2,400 acres of open space, William Frederick Hayden Park on Green Mountain is the second largest park in Lakewood. The park features a challenging network of shared use trails, with a 6,800-foot summit up Green Mountain Trail offering unique and stunning views of the Denver metropolitan area to the east and high mountain peaks to the west.

Beginning 1972, the majority of William Frederick Hayden Park was donated by or purchased from the Hayden family. Once home to the buffalo, this park now provides rich habitat for a diverse array of wildlife including coyotes, hawks, rattlesnakes, bluebirds, rabbit, mule deer and an occasional mountain lion.

We want to hear from you!

Subscribe to this page for updates, meeting notices and other opportunities to participate in the future of this special park. Use the tools below to ask a question of the project team or share an idea for the park.

Ask a question

Have a question about the William F. Hayden Park planning effort? Ask the project team here.

Email
loader image
Forgot password?
Didn't receive confirmation?
Register Now
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share I will post separate questions. Has the geological instability of "slide mountain" (as Green Mt is referred to at School of Mines) been evaluated as effected by trail excavation and surface hardening, especially in light of landslides on the north face in March 1998, and the effect of changes in drainage patterns? on Facebook Share I will post separate questions. Has the geological instability of "slide mountain" (as Green Mt is referred to at School of Mines) been evaluated as effected by trail excavation and surface hardening, especially in light of landslides on the north face in March 1998, and the effect of changes in drainage patterns? on X (formerly Twitter) Share I will post separate questions. Has the geological instability of "slide mountain" (as Green Mt is referred to at School of Mines) been evaluated as effected by trail excavation and surface hardening, especially in light of landslides on the north face in March 1998, and the effect of changes in drainage patterns? on Linkedin Email I will post separate questions. Has the geological instability of "slide mountain" (as Green Mt is referred to at School of Mines) been evaluated as effected by trail excavation and surface hardening, especially in light of landslides on the north face in March 1998, and the effect of changes in drainage patterns? link

    I will post separate questions. Has the geological instability of "slide mountain" (as Green Mt is referred to at School of Mines) been evaluated as effected by trail excavation and surface hardening, especially in light of landslides on the north face in March 1998, and the effect of changes in drainage patterns?

    dsherm asked 3 days ago

    Soil type mapping (NRCS Soils Data) was included in the Ecological Baseline Assessment and incorporated into the GIS evaluation for the Recreation Suitability Analysis mapping. Additional review of geologic mapping included dipping bedrock, slope failure and subsidence mapping available from the Lakewood and Jefferson County GIS databases. The project team is aware of the soil hazard and erosion concerns that occur over the majority of the WF Hayden Park property. It is our intent during future trail layout and design efforts to incorporate further soil investigations and best design practices to moderate erosion and stabilize trail treads and areas disturbed by construction, especially on soils presenting moderate to severe erosion hazard. We understand trail designs will require frequent grade reversals, areas of tread stabilization, armored switchbacks and drainage crossings, and other mitigations to stabilize treads. 

  • Share For the various types of trails, in particular the Base Loop, what will the surface be constructed of, and will this require side cuts into the soils to 5-6 ft wide paths? on Facebook Share For the various types of trails, in particular the Base Loop, what will the surface be constructed of, and will this require side cuts into the soils to 5-6 ft wide paths? on X (formerly Twitter) Share For the various types of trails, in particular the Base Loop, what will the surface be constructed of, and will this require side cuts into the soils to 5-6 ft wide paths? on Linkedin Email For the various types of trails, in particular the Base Loop, what will the surface be constructed of, and will this require side cuts into the soils to 5-6 ft wide paths? link

    For the various types of trails, in particular the Base Loop, what will the surface be constructed of, and will this require side cuts into the soils to 5-6 ft wide paths?

    dsherm asked 3 days ago

    Thank you for your question! The majority of the multi-purpose trails are planned to be native surface trails that utilize on-site soils for the trail surface. Isolated areas may require special surface treatment where excessive organics or silty soils contribute to prolonged muddy or unstable conditions. The wider Base Loop trail is under consideration for an improved natural surface tread, potentially imported but locally-sourced granite crusher fines. This design decision will be evaluated during future project design as warranted by slope, aspect and soil conditions. As with any trail construction on sloping ground, excavations and fills will be required on side slopes to effect a level tread, the extent dependent on topography being traversed. 

  • Share First, I want to complement the planning team. Excellent draft. Three questions for you. First, I believe you need to include specific standards for the indicators you're proposing to monitor. Otherwise, how will you (and the public) know when action(s) is needed. Second, you should include an evaluation section at the end of the plan, indicating when and under what conditions the plan should be reviewed and updated. Finally, although you mentioned funding sources and relative costs for each phase, what is the likelihood of each phase being implemented and under what timeframe--e.g., years 1-2 phase 1, years 2-4 phase 2, etc? on Facebook Share First, I want to complement the planning team. Excellent draft. Three questions for you. First, I believe you need to include specific standards for the indicators you're proposing to monitor. Otherwise, how will you (and the public) know when action(s) is needed. Second, you should include an evaluation section at the end of the plan, indicating when and under what conditions the plan should be reviewed and updated. Finally, although you mentioned funding sources and relative costs for each phase, what is the likelihood of each phase being implemented and under what timeframe--e.g., years 1-2 phase 1, years 2-4 phase 2, etc? on X (formerly Twitter) Share First, I want to complement the planning team. Excellent draft. Three questions for you. First, I believe you need to include specific standards for the indicators you're proposing to monitor. Otherwise, how will you (and the public) know when action(s) is needed. Second, you should include an evaluation section at the end of the plan, indicating when and under what conditions the plan should be reviewed and updated. Finally, although you mentioned funding sources and relative costs for each phase, what is the likelihood of each phase being implemented and under what timeframe--e.g., years 1-2 phase 1, years 2-4 phase 2, etc? on Linkedin Email First, I want to complement the planning team. Excellent draft. Three questions for you. First, I believe you need to include specific standards for the indicators you're proposing to monitor. Otherwise, how will you (and the public) know when action(s) is needed. Second, you should include an evaluation section at the end of the plan, indicating when and under what conditions the plan should be reviewed and updated. Finally, although you mentioned funding sources and relative costs for each phase, what is the likelihood of each phase being implemented and under what timeframe--e.g., years 1-2 phase 1, years 2-4 phase 2, etc? link

    First, I want to complement the planning team. Excellent draft. Three questions for you. First, I believe you need to include specific standards for the indicators you're proposing to monitor. Otherwise, how will you (and the public) know when action(s) is needed. Second, you should include an evaluation section at the end of the plan, indicating when and under what conditions the plan should be reviewed and updated. Finally, although you mentioned funding sources and relative costs for each phase, what is the likelihood of each phase being implemented and under what timeframe--e.g., years 1-2 phase 1, years 2-4 phase 2, etc?

    michaelrees2 asked 9 days ago

    Thank you for your feedback, it has been provided to the project team. In regards to implementation, phases are not tied to specific timelines given that resources and funding for implementation are not in place today. This plan will serve as a guiding document and provide the project team the opportunity to seek grant funding and partnerships, at this time to work towards implementation of phase 1. In addition, some plan components can be completed with in house teams and those will be incorporated into the regular maintenance program. Examples could include signage and wayfinding, hiker bypass trail, trail closures and repairs. 

  • Share How will the additional staffing called out in the various phases be funded? on Facebook Share How will the additional staffing called out in the various phases be funded? on X (formerly Twitter) Share How will the additional staffing called out in the various phases be funded? on Linkedin Email How will the additional staffing called out in the various phases be funded? link

    How will the additional staffing called out in the various phases be funded?

    dsherm asked 3 days ago

    Thank you for your question. Staffing resources are considered separately from the planning effort through the city's Annual Budget Process. 

  • Share The draft survey was 1 question?? If I had known that I would have added more details to my answer. Now I’m not allowed to make any changes to my answer. This was not a proper survey in my opinion and I’m incredibly upset that I spent so much time reviewing the draft plan and have no way to provide feedback! on Facebook Share The draft survey was 1 question?? If I had known that I would have added more details to my answer. Now I’m not allowed to make any changes to my answer. This was not a proper survey in my opinion and I’m incredibly upset that I spent so much time reviewing the draft plan and have no way to provide feedback! on X (formerly Twitter) Share The draft survey was 1 question?? If I had known that I would have added more details to my answer. Now I’m not allowed to make any changes to my answer. This was not a proper survey in my opinion and I’m incredibly upset that I spent so much time reviewing the draft plan and have no way to provide feedback! on Linkedin Email The draft survey was 1 question?? If I had known that I would have added more details to my answer. Now I’m not allowed to make any changes to my answer. This was not a proper survey in my opinion and I’m incredibly upset that I spent so much time reviewing the draft plan and have no way to provide feedback! link

    The draft survey was 1 question?? If I had known that I would have added more details to my answer. Now I’m not allowed to make any changes to my answer. This was not a proper survey in my opinion and I’m incredibly upset that I spent so much time reviewing the draft plan and have no way to provide feedback!

    Willrideforbeer asked about 23 hours ago

    You are welcome to use the comment tool to submit additional comments or email us at CRInfo@LakewoodCO.gov. 

  • Share Thank you all for such a thoughtful plan! Green Mountain is one of the few places near Denver where people can fly paragliders and hang gliders. Will the final plan recognize paragliding as a use of the park and keep access to the launch and landing areas? on Facebook Share Thank you all for such a thoughtful plan! Green Mountain is one of the few places near Denver where people can fly paragliders and hang gliders. Will the final plan recognize paragliding as a use of the park and keep access to the launch and landing areas? on X (formerly Twitter) Share Thank you all for such a thoughtful plan! Green Mountain is one of the few places near Denver where people can fly paragliders and hang gliders. Will the final plan recognize paragliding as a use of the park and keep access to the launch and landing areas? on Linkedin Email Thank you all for such a thoughtful plan! Green Mountain is one of the few places near Denver where people can fly paragliders and hang gliders. Will the final plan recognize paragliding as a use of the park and keep access to the launch and landing areas? link

    Thank you all for such a thoughtful plan! Green Mountain is one of the few places near Denver where people can fly paragliders and hang gliders. Will the final plan recognize paragliding as a use of the park and keep access to the launch and landing areas?

    Noel asked 5 days ago

    Hi there, the permitted paragliding and launch area will remain as it is today. Thank you

  • Share When doing the survey I was asked one question - what I liked about the plan. Then the survey stopped and would not let me access for anymore comments. How do I send comments? Concerns regarding geologic stability (changes in drainage patterns) of "slide mountain" with new construction; no parking available at new S Rogers Way access (currently emergency vehicle access only); no discussion of trail surface finish; increase in taxes for new ranger hires. How do I submit comments on these issues. Motorized/electric bikes should not be allowed. on Facebook Share When doing the survey I was asked one question - what I liked about the plan. Then the survey stopped and would not let me access for anymore comments. How do I send comments? Concerns regarding geologic stability (changes in drainage patterns) of "slide mountain" with new construction; no parking available at new S Rogers Way access (currently emergency vehicle access only); no discussion of trail surface finish; increase in taxes for new ranger hires. How do I submit comments on these issues. Motorized/electric bikes should not be allowed. on X (formerly Twitter) Share When doing the survey I was asked one question - what I liked about the plan. Then the survey stopped and would not let me access for anymore comments. How do I send comments? Concerns regarding geologic stability (changes in drainage patterns) of "slide mountain" with new construction; no parking available at new S Rogers Way access (currently emergency vehicle access only); no discussion of trail surface finish; increase in taxes for new ranger hires. How do I submit comments on these issues. Motorized/electric bikes should not be allowed. on Linkedin Email When doing the survey I was asked one question - what I liked about the plan. Then the survey stopped and would not let me access for anymore comments. How do I send comments? Concerns regarding geologic stability (changes in drainage patterns) of "slide mountain" with new construction; no parking available at new S Rogers Way access (currently emergency vehicle access only); no discussion of trail surface finish; increase in taxes for new ranger hires. How do I submit comments on these issues. Motorized/electric bikes should not be allowed. link

    When doing the survey I was asked one question - what I liked about the plan. Then the survey stopped and would not let me access for anymore comments. How do I send comments? Concerns regarding geologic stability (changes in drainage patterns) of "slide mountain" with new construction; no parking available at new S Rogers Way access (currently emergency vehicle access only); no discussion of trail surface finish; increase in taxes for new ranger hires. How do I submit comments on these issues. Motorized/electric bikes should not be allowed.

    dsherm asked 3 days ago

    Given space limitations on the project page, please feel free to send your comments to CRinfo@lakewoodCO.gov and we will ensure it is provided to the project team. Thank you.

  • Share I'm surprised that you have not considered hiker only trails on the north side. I'd really like to see that option be included in the final plan. Although most trail users are pretty good about trail sharing, it's just going to create lots of traffic on the few shared trails and increased frustration and conflict will be the result. Is a hiker only trail at all being considered for the North side? on Facebook Share I'm surprised that you have not considered hiker only trails on the north side. I'd really like to see that option be included in the final plan. Although most trail users are pretty good about trail sharing, it's just going to create lots of traffic on the few shared trails and increased frustration and conflict will be the result. Is a hiker only trail at all being considered for the North side? on X (formerly Twitter) Share I'm surprised that you have not considered hiker only trails on the north side. I'd really like to see that option be included in the final plan. Although most trail users are pretty good about trail sharing, it's just going to create lots of traffic on the few shared trails and increased frustration and conflict will be the result. Is a hiker only trail at all being considered for the North side? on Linkedin Email I'm surprised that you have not considered hiker only trails on the north side. I'd really like to see that option be included in the final plan. Although most trail users are pretty good about trail sharing, it's just going to create lots of traffic on the few shared trails and increased frustration and conflict will be the result. Is a hiker only trail at all being considered for the North side? link

    I'm surprised that you have not considered hiker only trails on the north side. I'd really like to see that option be included in the final plan. Although most trail users are pretty good about trail sharing, it's just going to create lots of traffic on the few shared trails and increased frustration and conflict will be the result. Is a hiker only trail at all being considered for the North side?

    Tracee asked 9 days ago

    Thank you for your feedback, it has been shared with the project team. We do not have plans for a designated hiker trail with the exception of the Rooney Trail. That said, incorporating downhill only bike trails in strategic areas is a practice that removes downhill biking from popular summit hiking trails, providing a better experience for hikers on those trails on the north side. 

  • Share I have heard there is a plan to pave a trail around the mountain - that seems very bad for the environment and for the mountain. Is this the current plan? It is not clear from the map drawing. on Facebook Share I have heard there is a plan to pave a trail around the mountain - that seems very bad for the environment and for the mountain. Is this the current plan? It is not clear from the map drawing. on X (formerly Twitter) Share I have heard there is a plan to pave a trail around the mountain - that seems very bad for the environment and for the mountain. Is this the current plan? It is not clear from the map drawing. on Linkedin Email I have heard there is a plan to pave a trail around the mountain - that seems very bad for the environment and for the mountain. Is this the current plan? It is not clear from the map drawing. link

    I have heard there is a plan to pave a trail around the mountain - that seems very bad for the environment and for the mountain. Is this the current plan? It is not clear from the map drawing.

    JOH asked about 1 month ago

    Thank you for reaching out to us regarding the William F. Hayden Plan. The plan includes a 4-6 ft soft surface trail that will circle the base of the mountain. This plan is conceptual in nature, further design will be required prior to development of new trails. This trail has many advantages, including serving as a fire buffer to residential neighborhoods, creating equitable access to the mountain, and working as a collector trail to allow closure of social trails in ecologically sensitive areas. One of the top priorities of this plan is conservation and resource protection. The plan includes extensive analysis and mapping to understand which areas of the mountain could host or retain trails. The draft plan will be available for public review early October. 

  • Share I am wondering if you are aware of the proposed private backyard pickleball court that was approved by the Mesa View Estates HOA at 170 S. Kilmer St. The property abuts the William F Hayden North Trail. This will cause irreputable damage to the peaceful hiking trails and displace wildlife. The property sits at the bottom of the hill so the noise will cause and amphitheater effect. The high-frequency pop from the pickleball paddles will carry up and bounce off of the hill causing an echo that will be heard near and far. • Disruption of Songbirds: Green Mountain is home to numerous nesting and migratory birds. Birds rely on distinct acoustic frequencies to communicate, establish territory, and attract mates. The repetitive, loud thwack of pickleball falls precisely into the acoustic frequencies birds use, masking their songs and forcing them to alter their calls or abandon nesting sites near the park boundary. • The "Predator Alert" Response: Unlike steady highway noise, pickleball creates an impulsive, erratic rhythm. Mammals like deer, coyotes, and small rodents perceive these sudden, sharp sounds as potential threats. This keeps animals in a constant state of hyper-vigilance, triggering their flight response and driving them away from crucial foraging grounds near the neighborhood edge. • Habitat Fragmentation: Noise pollution effectively shrinks the usable size of a nature preserve. Even if the physical land remains untouched, a zone of constant, harsh sound creates an invisible barrier that sensitive wildlife species will actively avoid, fracturing the ecosystem along the Kilmer Street border. This wil be in clear violation of the Unincorporated Jefferson County Noise Abatement Policy but the HOA is letting it go ahead because "building a court is not illegal". And no nuisance noise has occurred yet. I have written many emails to the City of Lakewood, Mayor, representatives, Jefferson County Open Space, Aaron Roth, and countless others and I am not getting a response or any help stopping this from happening. Can you help save this side of the mountain or direct me to someone who can? Thank you for listening! on Facebook Share I am wondering if you are aware of the proposed private backyard pickleball court that was approved by the Mesa View Estates HOA at 170 S. Kilmer St. The property abuts the William F Hayden North Trail. This will cause irreputable damage to the peaceful hiking trails and displace wildlife. The property sits at the bottom of the hill so the noise will cause and amphitheater effect. The high-frequency pop from the pickleball paddles will carry up and bounce off of the hill causing an echo that will be heard near and far. • Disruption of Songbirds: Green Mountain is home to numerous nesting and migratory birds. Birds rely on distinct acoustic frequencies to communicate, establish territory, and attract mates. The repetitive, loud thwack of pickleball falls precisely into the acoustic frequencies birds use, masking their songs and forcing them to alter their calls or abandon nesting sites near the park boundary. • The "Predator Alert" Response: Unlike steady highway noise, pickleball creates an impulsive, erratic rhythm. Mammals like deer, coyotes, and small rodents perceive these sudden, sharp sounds as potential threats. This keeps animals in a constant state of hyper-vigilance, triggering their flight response and driving them away from crucial foraging grounds near the neighborhood edge. • Habitat Fragmentation: Noise pollution effectively shrinks the usable size of a nature preserve. Even if the physical land remains untouched, a zone of constant, harsh sound creates an invisible barrier that sensitive wildlife species will actively avoid, fracturing the ecosystem along the Kilmer Street border. This wil be in clear violation of the Unincorporated Jefferson County Noise Abatement Policy but the HOA is letting it go ahead because "building a court is not illegal". And no nuisance noise has occurred yet. I have written many emails to the City of Lakewood, Mayor, representatives, Jefferson County Open Space, Aaron Roth, and countless others and I am not getting a response or any help stopping this from happening. Can you help save this side of the mountain or direct me to someone who can? Thank you for listening! on X (formerly Twitter) Share I am wondering if you are aware of the proposed private backyard pickleball court that was approved by the Mesa View Estates HOA at 170 S. Kilmer St. The property abuts the William F Hayden North Trail. This will cause irreputable damage to the peaceful hiking trails and displace wildlife. The property sits at the bottom of the hill so the noise will cause and amphitheater effect. The high-frequency pop from the pickleball paddles will carry up and bounce off of the hill causing an echo that will be heard near and far. • Disruption of Songbirds: Green Mountain is home to numerous nesting and migratory birds. Birds rely on distinct acoustic frequencies to communicate, establish territory, and attract mates. The repetitive, loud thwack of pickleball falls precisely into the acoustic frequencies birds use, masking their songs and forcing them to alter their calls or abandon nesting sites near the park boundary. • The "Predator Alert" Response: Unlike steady highway noise, pickleball creates an impulsive, erratic rhythm. Mammals like deer, coyotes, and small rodents perceive these sudden, sharp sounds as potential threats. This keeps animals in a constant state of hyper-vigilance, triggering their flight response and driving them away from crucial foraging grounds near the neighborhood edge. • Habitat Fragmentation: Noise pollution effectively shrinks the usable size of a nature preserve. Even if the physical land remains untouched, a zone of constant, harsh sound creates an invisible barrier that sensitive wildlife species will actively avoid, fracturing the ecosystem along the Kilmer Street border. This wil be in clear violation of the Unincorporated Jefferson County Noise Abatement Policy but the HOA is letting it go ahead because "building a court is not illegal". And no nuisance noise has occurred yet. I have written many emails to the City of Lakewood, Mayor, representatives, Jefferson County Open Space, Aaron Roth, and countless others and I am not getting a response or any help stopping this from happening. Can you help save this side of the mountain or direct me to someone who can? Thank you for listening! on Linkedin Email I am wondering if you are aware of the proposed private backyard pickleball court that was approved by the Mesa View Estates HOA at 170 S. Kilmer St. The property abuts the William F Hayden North Trail. This will cause irreputable damage to the peaceful hiking trails and displace wildlife. The property sits at the bottom of the hill so the noise will cause and amphitheater effect. The high-frequency pop from the pickleball paddles will carry up and bounce off of the hill causing an echo that will be heard near and far. • Disruption of Songbirds: Green Mountain is home to numerous nesting and migratory birds. Birds rely on distinct acoustic frequencies to communicate, establish territory, and attract mates. The repetitive, loud thwack of pickleball falls precisely into the acoustic frequencies birds use, masking their songs and forcing them to alter their calls or abandon nesting sites near the park boundary. • The "Predator Alert" Response: Unlike steady highway noise, pickleball creates an impulsive, erratic rhythm. Mammals like deer, coyotes, and small rodents perceive these sudden, sharp sounds as potential threats. This keeps animals in a constant state of hyper-vigilance, triggering their flight response and driving them away from crucial foraging grounds near the neighborhood edge. • Habitat Fragmentation: Noise pollution effectively shrinks the usable size of a nature preserve. Even if the physical land remains untouched, a zone of constant, harsh sound creates an invisible barrier that sensitive wildlife species will actively avoid, fracturing the ecosystem along the Kilmer Street border. This wil be in clear violation of the Unincorporated Jefferson County Noise Abatement Policy but the HOA is letting it go ahead because "building a court is not illegal". And no nuisance noise has occurred yet. I have written many emails to the City of Lakewood, Mayor, representatives, Jefferson County Open Space, Aaron Roth, and countless others and I am not getting a response or any help stopping this from happening. Can you help save this side of the mountain or direct me to someone who can? Thank you for listening! link

    I am wondering if you are aware of the proposed private backyard pickleball court that was approved by the Mesa View Estates HOA at 170 S. Kilmer St. The property abuts the William F Hayden North Trail. This will cause irreputable damage to the peaceful hiking trails and displace wildlife. The property sits at the bottom of the hill so the noise will cause and amphitheater effect. The high-frequency pop from the pickleball paddles will carry up and bounce off of the hill causing an echo that will be heard near and far. • Disruption of Songbirds: Green Mountain is home to numerous nesting and migratory birds. Birds rely on distinct acoustic frequencies to communicate, establish territory, and attract mates. The repetitive, loud thwack of pickleball falls precisely into the acoustic frequencies birds use, masking their songs and forcing them to alter their calls or abandon nesting sites near the park boundary. • The "Predator Alert" Response: Unlike steady highway noise, pickleball creates an impulsive, erratic rhythm. Mammals like deer, coyotes, and small rodents perceive these sudden, sharp sounds as potential threats. This keeps animals in a constant state of hyper-vigilance, triggering their flight response and driving them away from crucial foraging grounds near the neighborhood edge. • Habitat Fragmentation: Noise pollution effectively shrinks the usable size of a nature preserve. Even if the physical land remains untouched, a zone of constant, harsh sound creates an invisible barrier that sensitive wildlife species will actively avoid, fracturing the ecosystem along the Kilmer Street border. This wil be in clear violation of the Unincorporated Jefferson County Noise Abatement Policy but the HOA is letting it go ahead because "building a court is not illegal". And no nuisance noise has occurred yet. I have written many emails to the City of Lakewood, Mayor, representatives, Jefferson County Open Space, Aaron Roth, and countless others and I am not getting a response or any help stopping this from happening. Can you help save this side of the mountain or direct me to someone who can? Thank you for listening!

    CJ asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your feedback, this information was included with the service request you had already submitted. 

Page last updated: 06 Oct 2026, 02:39 PM