Go Back

Graham Park Improvements

Share Graham Park Improvements on Facebook Share Graham Park Improvements on Twitter Share Graham Park Improvements on Linkedin Email Graham Park Improvements link


Photo of overlook view at Graham ParkViews from Graham Park Graham Park is a hidden gem with glorious views located at 2345 Routt St. in Ward 1 in northwest Lakewood. Donated by the Graham family in four separate parcels in the 1980s and 1990s, this park provides passive open space and xeric gardens with seating to take in the skyline. A tennis court was added to the park at the bottom of the hill in 1982 to serve the neighborhood as an approved addition.

Funding is available to make improvements to Graham Park in concert with the family's wishes. Thank you to those who attended the Open House on November 8, 2023. View a summary of resident feedback and the revised concept for the park. Based on public feedback, a thorough assessment of restoration costs by an outside consultant to bring the house to the standards of a public facility, and the limitations on revenue generation, the Graham House will be removed from the park in favor of the proposed concept. Timing of the removal is to be determined. Questions may be submitted using the tools below.

Learn more about the history of the park

View information about the original landscape architect, architect of the Graham house, and deeds by parcel.

We want to hear from you

Use the tools to ask a question, share an idea, or leave a comment.


Photo of overlook view at Graham ParkViews from Graham Park Graham Park is a hidden gem with glorious views located at 2345 Routt St. in Ward 1 in northwest Lakewood. Donated by the Graham family in four separate parcels in the 1980s and 1990s, this park provides passive open space and xeric gardens with seating to take in the skyline. A tennis court was added to the park at the bottom of the hill in 1982 to serve the neighborhood as an approved addition.

Funding is available to make improvements to Graham Park in concert with the family's wishes. Thank you to those who attended the Open House on November 8, 2023. View a summary of resident feedback and the revised concept for the park. Based on public feedback, a thorough assessment of restoration costs by an outside consultant to bring the house to the standards of a public facility, and the limitations on revenue generation, the Graham House will be removed from the park in favor of the proposed concept. Timing of the removal is to be determined. Questions may be submitted using the tools below.

Learn more about the history of the park

View information about the original landscape architect, architect of the Graham house, and deeds by parcel.

We want to hear from you

Use the tools to ask a question, share an idea, or leave a comment.

Ask a question

Have a question about Graham Park or the improvements being considered? Ask it here. Your question will be visible to other residents. The project team will respond within three business days. 

loader image
Forgot password?
Didn't receive confirmation?
Register Now
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share How was the 50/50 split determined? on Facebook Share How was the 50/50 split determined? on Twitter Share How was the 50/50 split determined? on Linkedin Email How was the 50/50 split determined? link

    How was the 50/50 split determined?

    lkmajors asked 5 days ago

    This was based on the comments received both on the comment board at the meeting, and through the comment card handouts collected at the meeting. We have also had conversations with nearby residents. Additionally, the information provided on the project page regarding the cost of rehabilitation and the inability to recoup those costs through revenue generation. 

    Hope this helps,

  • Share In the deed document, would you please check to make sure all pages of the documents are available? Specifically, it looks as though page 2 is missing after page 16 and page 1 is missing before page 17. The top sentence of page 17 is a continuation of a sentence from a page 1, but does not match to page 16. This is the document regarding the house, so may be important to convey Jean Graham's wishes. Thank you. on Facebook Share In the deed document, would you please check to make sure all pages of the documents are available? Specifically, it looks as though page 2 is missing after page 16 and page 1 is missing before page 17. The top sentence of page 17 is a continuation of a sentence from a page 1, but does not match to page 16. This is the document regarding the house, so may be important to convey Jean Graham's wishes. Thank you. on Twitter Share In the deed document, would you please check to make sure all pages of the documents are available? Specifically, it looks as though page 2 is missing after page 16 and page 1 is missing before page 17. The top sentence of page 17 is a continuation of a sentence from a page 1, but does not match to page 16. This is the document regarding the house, so may be important to convey Jean Graham's wishes. Thank you. on Linkedin Email In the deed document, would you please check to make sure all pages of the documents are available? Specifically, it looks as though page 2 is missing after page 16 and page 1 is missing before page 17. The top sentence of page 17 is a continuation of a sentence from a page 1, but does not match to page 16. This is the document regarding the house, so may be important to convey Jean Graham's wishes. Thank you. link

    In the deed document, would you please check to make sure all pages of the documents are available? Specifically, it looks as though page 2 is missing after page 16 and page 1 is missing before page 17. The top sentence of page 17 is a continuation of a sentence from a page 1, but does not match to page 16. This is the document regarding the house, so may be important to convey Jean Graham's wishes. Thank you.

    lkmajors asked 5 days ago

    Hi there,

    Apologies for the delay, I had to dig into this. It appears this is how the deed was recorded. There is no further information recorded regarding the house. You may also verify the deed materials through the Jefferson County Assessor's office via their JMaps application. https://gis.jeffco.us/webmaps/jmap/index.html.

    Thank you

  • Share Too bad the house has to be torn down, is that really necessary and doubt it would be in the Grahams wishes ..... on Facebook Share Too bad the house has to be torn down, is that really necessary and doubt it would be in the Grahams wishes ..... on Twitter Share Too bad the house has to be torn down, is that really necessary and doubt it would be in the Grahams wishes ..... on Linkedin Email Too bad the house has to be torn down, is that really necessary and doubt it would be in the Grahams wishes ..... link

    Too bad the house has to be torn down, is that really necessary and doubt it would be in the Grahams wishes .....

    Ann Lacey asked 11 days ago

    Thank you for your feedback. You can review the Deeds of Transfer on the project page and here: https://www.lakewoodtogether.org/21244/widgets/69632/documents/48495

  • Share The feedback from the public comments all ask to keep the house and make it useable. Of course there is no current revenue - it cannot be rented right now- I know people who have wanted to rent it in the last years and couldn't! It is a super cool and historic house!! on Facebook Share The feedback from the public comments all ask to keep the house and make it useable. Of course there is no current revenue - it cannot be rented right now- I know people who have wanted to rent it in the last years and couldn't! It is a super cool and historic house!! on Twitter Share The feedback from the public comments all ask to keep the house and make it useable. Of course there is no current revenue - it cannot be rented right now- I know people who have wanted to rent it in the last years and couldn't! It is a super cool and historic house!! on Linkedin Email The feedback from the public comments all ask to keep the house and make it useable. Of course there is no current revenue - it cannot be rented right now- I know people who have wanted to rent it in the last years and couldn't! It is a super cool and historic house!! link

    The feedback from the public comments all ask to keep the house and make it useable. Of course there is no current revenue - it cannot be rented right now- I know people who have wanted to rent it in the last years and couldn't! It is a super cool and historic house!!

    lkonsella asked 11 days ago

    Thank you for your feedback. Revenue estimates are based on current market data and comparisons to other city rental properties. You can learn more here: https://www.lakewoodtogether.org/21244/widgets/69632/documents/54065

  • Share I am totally against erasing the house. It's value can not be measured just by monetary considerations. It has a historic and esthetic value and should be preserved by the city. I visited it again today - it has new roof (if I remember correctly 2 years old?) and most of original windows, including at least one big one, are replaced by more energy-efficient double-paneled vinyl ones. If restored, it could be a beautiful example of mid-century architecture. The house just needs somebody to take care of it. What about donating it to nonprofit organization with the conditions that the community will have access to the park? This would not cost city money, house would be preserved, nonprofit organization, like Girl scouts of America would take care of it and would make it profitable by renting it to wedding parties or meetings, volunteers will help to restore it ... This could be a beautiful house - just go and see the big, beautiful windows with fantastic views, woodwork inside. Estimate of the restoration cost seems too high - I would seek another opinion because many items on your list are too vague. I myself live in another house designed by Boggs (2001 Routt St.) and built around 1953, and we did not have any serious issues with the original house, beside the leaking flat roof... Our house is nothing like Graham's, it was just a cabin when originally built, but visitors seem to like it and I am sure that restored Graham's house would benefit all. Another point - i think that your estimate of 50% of community wishing the house to be destroyed is not correct - based on my personal interactions with the neighbors i think that most of us want the house preserved. Maria Deszcz-Pan on Facebook Share I am totally against erasing the house. It's value can not be measured just by monetary considerations. It has a historic and esthetic value and should be preserved by the city. I visited it again today - it has new roof (if I remember correctly 2 years old?) and most of original windows, including at least one big one, are replaced by more energy-efficient double-paneled vinyl ones. If restored, it could be a beautiful example of mid-century architecture. The house just needs somebody to take care of it. What about donating it to nonprofit organization with the conditions that the community will have access to the park? This would not cost city money, house would be preserved, nonprofit organization, like Girl scouts of America would take care of it and would make it profitable by renting it to wedding parties or meetings, volunteers will help to restore it ... This could be a beautiful house - just go and see the big, beautiful windows with fantastic views, woodwork inside. Estimate of the restoration cost seems too high - I would seek another opinion because many items on your list are too vague. I myself live in another house designed by Boggs (2001 Routt St.) and built around 1953, and we did not have any serious issues with the original house, beside the leaking flat roof... Our house is nothing like Graham's, it was just a cabin when originally built, but visitors seem to like it and I am sure that restored Graham's house would benefit all. Another point - i think that your estimate of 50% of community wishing the house to be destroyed is not correct - based on my personal interactions with the neighbors i think that most of us want the house preserved. Maria Deszcz-Pan on Twitter Share I am totally against erasing the house. It's value can not be measured just by monetary considerations. It has a historic and esthetic value and should be preserved by the city. I visited it again today - it has new roof (if I remember correctly 2 years old?) and most of original windows, including at least one big one, are replaced by more energy-efficient double-paneled vinyl ones. If restored, it could be a beautiful example of mid-century architecture. The house just needs somebody to take care of it. What about donating it to nonprofit organization with the conditions that the community will have access to the park? This would not cost city money, house would be preserved, nonprofit organization, like Girl scouts of America would take care of it and would make it profitable by renting it to wedding parties or meetings, volunteers will help to restore it ... This could be a beautiful house - just go and see the big, beautiful windows with fantastic views, woodwork inside. Estimate of the restoration cost seems too high - I would seek another opinion because many items on your list are too vague. I myself live in another house designed by Boggs (2001 Routt St.) and built around 1953, and we did not have any serious issues with the original house, beside the leaking flat roof... Our house is nothing like Graham's, it was just a cabin when originally built, but visitors seem to like it and I am sure that restored Graham's house would benefit all. Another point - i think that your estimate of 50% of community wishing the house to be destroyed is not correct - based on my personal interactions with the neighbors i think that most of us want the house preserved. Maria Deszcz-Pan on Linkedin Email I am totally against erasing the house. It's value can not be measured just by monetary considerations. It has a historic and esthetic value and should be preserved by the city. I visited it again today - it has new roof (if I remember correctly 2 years old?) and most of original windows, including at least one big one, are replaced by more energy-efficient double-paneled vinyl ones. If restored, it could be a beautiful example of mid-century architecture. The house just needs somebody to take care of it. What about donating it to nonprofit organization with the conditions that the community will have access to the park? This would not cost city money, house would be preserved, nonprofit organization, like Girl scouts of America would take care of it and would make it profitable by renting it to wedding parties or meetings, volunteers will help to restore it ... This could be a beautiful house - just go and see the big, beautiful windows with fantastic views, woodwork inside. Estimate of the restoration cost seems too high - I would seek another opinion because many items on your list are too vague. I myself live in another house designed by Boggs (2001 Routt St.) and built around 1953, and we did not have any serious issues with the original house, beside the leaking flat roof... Our house is nothing like Graham's, it was just a cabin when originally built, but visitors seem to like it and I am sure that restored Graham's house would benefit all. Another point - i think that your estimate of 50% of community wishing the house to be destroyed is not correct - based on my personal interactions with the neighbors i think that most of us want the house preserved. Maria Deszcz-Pan link

    I am totally against erasing the house. It's value can not be measured just by monetary considerations. It has a historic and esthetic value and should be preserved by the city. I visited it again today - it has new roof (if I remember correctly 2 years old?) and most of original windows, including at least one big one, are replaced by more energy-efficient double-paneled vinyl ones. If restored, it could be a beautiful example of mid-century architecture. The house just needs somebody to take care of it. What about donating it to nonprofit organization with the conditions that the community will have access to the park? This would not cost city money, house would be preserved, nonprofit organization, like Girl scouts of America would take care of it and would make it profitable by renting it to wedding parties or meetings, volunteers will help to restore it ... This could be a beautiful house - just go and see the big, beautiful windows with fantastic views, woodwork inside. Estimate of the restoration cost seems too high - I would seek another opinion because many items on your list are too vague. I myself live in another house designed by Boggs (2001 Routt St.) and built around 1953, and we did not have any serious issues with the original house, beside the leaking flat roof... Our house is nothing like Graham's, it was just a cabin when originally built, but visitors seem to like it and I am sure that restored Graham's house would benefit all. Another point - i think that your estimate of 50% of community wishing the house to be destroyed is not correct - based on my personal interactions with the neighbors i think that most of us want the house preserved. Maria Deszcz-Pan

    Maryla asked 8 days ago

    Thank you for your feedback.

  • Share Hi, these are some of the questions I posted in my email to the City of Lakewood 1. You did not provide any proof about "family wishes". From the neighbors who knew Ms. Graham we learned that she wanted the house to be preserved. Can you provide the proof of "family wishes"? And why the family would want the house to be removed? What interest the family still has in the property? 2. The community wanted to keep the house - check the comments on your website . Why our wishes were ignored? 3. Did you choose the contractors who are supposed to do the work? How did you decide? How many offers did you get? Both for the "improvement" and the demolition. 4. How many independent opinions about the cost of the upgrading the house did you collect? 5. Who was the person that estimated the improvement costs? 6. Did you contact the preservation department whether the house has historical value? What is the process to put the house on the list? 7. Why you do not provide the date of expected work? Is it because you want the community to face "done deal" of demolished house? Maria Deszcz-Pan on Facebook Share Hi, these are some of the questions I posted in my email to the City of Lakewood 1. You did not provide any proof about "family wishes". From the neighbors who knew Ms. Graham we learned that she wanted the house to be preserved. Can you provide the proof of "family wishes"? And why the family would want the house to be removed? What interest the family still has in the property? 2. The community wanted to keep the house - check the comments on your website . Why our wishes were ignored? 3. Did you choose the contractors who are supposed to do the work? How did you decide? How many offers did you get? Both for the "improvement" and the demolition. 4. How many independent opinions about the cost of the upgrading the house did you collect? 5. Who was the person that estimated the improvement costs? 6. Did you contact the preservation department whether the house has historical value? What is the process to put the house on the list? 7. Why you do not provide the date of expected work? Is it because you want the community to face "done deal" of demolished house? Maria Deszcz-Pan on Twitter Share Hi, these are some of the questions I posted in my email to the City of Lakewood 1. You did not provide any proof about "family wishes". From the neighbors who knew Ms. Graham we learned that she wanted the house to be preserved. Can you provide the proof of "family wishes"? And why the family would want the house to be removed? What interest the family still has in the property? 2. The community wanted to keep the house - check the comments on your website . Why our wishes were ignored? 3. Did you choose the contractors who are supposed to do the work? How did you decide? How many offers did you get? Both for the "improvement" and the demolition. 4. How many independent opinions about the cost of the upgrading the house did you collect? 5. Who was the person that estimated the improvement costs? 6. Did you contact the preservation department whether the house has historical value? What is the process to put the house on the list? 7. Why you do not provide the date of expected work? Is it because you want the community to face "done deal" of demolished house? Maria Deszcz-Pan on Linkedin Email Hi, these are some of the questions I posted in my email to the City of Lakewood 1. You did not provide any proof about "family wishes". From the neighbors who knew Ms. Graham we learned that she wanted the house to be preserved. Can you provide the proof of "family wishes"? And why the family would want the house to be removed? What interest the family still has in the property? 2. The community wanted to keep the house - check the comments on your website . Why our wishes were ignored? 3. Did you choose the contractors who are supposed to do the work? How did you decide? How many offers did you get? Both for the "improvement" and the demolition. 4. How many independent opinions about the cost of the upgrading the house did you collect? 5. Who was the person that estimated the improvement costs? 6. Did you contact the preservation department whether the house has historical value? What is the process to put the house on the list? 7. Why you do not provide the date of expected work? Is it because you want the community to face "done deal" of demolished house? Maria Deszcz-Pan link

    Hi, these are some of the questions I posted in my email to the City of Lakewood 1. You did not provide any proof about "family wishes". From the neighbors who knew Ms. Graham we learned that she wanted the house to be preserved. Can you provide the proof of "family wishes"? And why the family would want the house to be removed? What interest the family still has in the property? 2. The community wanted to keep the house - check the comments on your website . Why our wishes were ignored? 3. Did you choose the contractors who are supposed to do the work? How did you decide? How many offers did you get? Both for the "improvement" and the demolition. 4. How many independent opinions about the cost of the upgrading the house did you collect? 5. Who was the person that estimated the improvement costs? 6. Did you contact the preservation department whether the house has historical value? What is the process to put the house on the list? 7. Why you do not provide the date of expected work? Is it because you want the community to face "done deal" of demolished house? Maria Deszcz-Pan

    Maryla asked 14 days ago

    Hi Maria,

    Staff worked with Mrs. Graham through each Deed of Transfer. The deeds transferring each portion of the property to the city are posted on this project page for your review. You will see that the Graham's wanted to preserve the park, access to open space, and the views, but did not request preservation of the house. The City of Lakewood owns the property known as Graham Park.

    Through the public engagement process, approximately 50% of respondents requested that the house remain. In addition, many neighbors to the park have shared support for the park concept proposed. Note that this concept removed the shelter and does not expand the parking. Other outcomes of public feedback included keeping the park passive use, providing better ADA access, gardens, interpretive signage honoring the Graham family, and improved trails to enjoy the views.

    An independent third party outside the city provided the cost estimates for restoration. The city also utilized another outside firm to complete a facility assessment for several city facilities. This assessment also provided costs for improvements and annual maintenance costs over the next 20 years.

    We have provided details on the project page about the house and the architect who designed it. The Heritage, Culture and the Arts staff did not consider the house a historic structure. 

    We do not have a date for demolition as hiring a contractor will also include a competitive bid process and takes time. 

    Thank you for your detailed questions.

  • Share Would love to have a speed bump installed. People drive too fast down this street and I am worried about the increase in traffic as well as some of the biggest offenders are the construction and city workers. If no speed bump, need more speed limit signs and reminders that this is a residential area. The new project looks better than the first so thank you for listening to the residents. on Facebook Share Would love to have a speed bump installed. People drive too fast down this street and I am worried about the increase in traffic as well as some of the biggest offenders are the construction and city workers. If no speed bump, need more speed limit signs and reminders that this is a residential area. The new project looks better than the first so thank you for listening to the residents. on Twitter Share Would love to have a speed bump installed. People drive too fast down this street and I am worried about the increase in traffic as well as some of the biggest offenders are the construction and city workers. If no speed bump, need more speed limit signs and reminders that this is a residential area. The new project looks better than the first so thank you for listening to the residents. on Linkedin Email Would love to have a speed bump installed. People drive too fast down this street and I am worried about the increase in traffic as well as some of the biggest offenders are the construction and city workers. If no speed bump, need more speed limit signs and reminders that this is a residential area. The new project looks better than the first so thank you for listening to the residents. link

    Would love to have a speed bump installed. People drive too fast down this street and I am worried about the increase in traffic as well as some of the biggest offenders are the construction and city workers. If no speed bump, need more speed limit signs and reminders that this is a residential area. The new project looks better than the first so thank you for listening to the residents.

    Erin M asked 14 days ago

    We will share with feedback with the Public Works team as proposed with park improvements. Thank you!

  • Share I hate to see the Graham house removed but understand the finances and expenses involved so will accept the inevitable. Looking at the Concept Plan, under item B (Native xeric and rock gardens with benches) do benches include the existing bench which overlooks the tennis court? The existing bench is in poor condition and should be upgraded or replaced; it’s an ideal peaceful spot to sit and watch the sunsets. Under Item G (Park loop trail (3 laps per mile)) I am puzzled by the indication of steps through the native landscape. I would expect to see a continuation of the crushed rock trail with gentle curves to blend in with the existing layout of trails. Under Item I (Wheelchair garden loop – stone paving per Graham patio). Somehow stone paving and wheelchairs don’t seem compatible; I would expect a continuous flat concrete path as my concept of stone paving is pavers eventually become uneven and would be difficult for a wheelchair. Under maintenance appreciate having the trash barrel at the entrance off of Routt St. Dog walkers have increased since the building of apartments along Colfax. Having the trash barrel handy makes it convenient for them to easily get rid of their waste bags. on Facebook Share I hate to see the Graham house removed but understand the finances and expenses involved so will accept the inevitable. Looking at the Concept Plan, under item B (Native xeric and rock gardens with benches) do benches include the existing bench which overlooks the tennis court? The existing bench is in poor condition and should be upgraded or replaced; it’s an ideal peaceful spot to sit and watch the sunsets. Under Item G (Park loop trail (3 laps per mile)) I am puzzled by the indication of steps through the native landscape. I would expect to see a continuation of the crushed rock trail with gentle curves to blend in with the existing layout of trails. Under Item I (Wheelchair garden loop – stone paving per Graham patio). Somehow stone paving and wheelchairs don’t seem compatible; I would expect a continuous flat concrete path as my concept of stone paving is pavers eventually become uneven and would be difficult for a wheelchair. Under maintenance appreciate having the trash barrel at the entrance off of Routt St. Dog walkers have increased since the building of apartments along Colfax. Having the trash barrel handy makes it convenient for them to easily get rid of their waste bags. on Twitter Share I hate to see the Graham house removed but understand the finances and expenses involved so will accept the inevitable. Looking at the Concept Plan, under item B (Native xeric and rock gardens with benches) do benches include the existing bench which overlooks the tennis court? The existing bench is in poor condition and should be upgraded or replaced; it’s an ideal peaceful spot to sit and watch the sunsets. Under Item G (Park loop trail (3 laps per mile)) I am puzzled by the indication of steps through the native landscape. I would expect to see a continuation of the crushed rock trail with gentle curves to blend in with the existing layout of trails. Under Item I (Wheelchair garden loop – stone paving per Graham patio). Somehow stone paving and wheelchairs don’t seem compatible; I would expect a continuous flat concrete path as my concept of stone paving is pavers eventually become uneven and would be difficult for a wheelchair. Under maintenance appreciate having the trash barrel at the entrance off of Routt St. Dog walkers have increased since the building of apartments along Colfax. Having the trash barrel handy makes it convenient for them to easily get rid of their waste bags. on Linkedin Email I hate to see the Graham house removed but understand the finances and expenses involved so will accept the inevitable. Looking at the Concept Plan, under item B (Native xeric and rock gardens with benches) do benches include the existing bench which overlooks the tennis court? The existing bench is in poor condition and should be upgraded or replaced; it’s an ideal peaceful spot to sit and watch the sunsets. Under Item G (Park loop trail (3 laps per mile)) I am puzzled by the indication of steps through the native landscape. I would expect to see a continuation of the crushed rock trail with gentle curves to blend in with the existing layout of trails. Under Item I (Wheelchair garden loop – stone paving per Graham patio). Somehow stone paving and wheelchairs don’t seem compatible; I would expect a continuous flat concrete path as my concept of stone paving is pavers eventually become uneven and would be difficult for a wheelchair. Under maintenance appreciate having the trash barrel at the entrance off of Routt St. Dog walkers have increased since the building of apartments along Colfax. Having the trash barrel handy makes it convenient for them to easily get rid of their waste bags. link

    I hate to see the Graham house removed but understand the finances and expenses involved so will accept the inevitable. Looking at the Concept Plan, under item B (Native xeric and rock gardens with benches) do benches include the existing bench which overlooks the tennis court? The existing bench is in poor condition and should be upgraded or replaced; it’s an ideal peaceful spot to sit and watch the sunsets. Under Item G (Park loop trail (3 laps per mile)) I am puzzled by the indication of steps through the native landscape. I would expect to see a continuation of the crushed rock trail with gentle curves to blend in with the existing layout of trails. Under Item I (Wheelchair garden loop – stone paving per Graham patio). Somehow stone paving and wheelchairs don’t seem compatible; I would expect a continuous flat concrete path as my concept of stone paving is pavers eventually become uneven and would be difficult for a wheelchair. Under maintenance appreciate having the trash barrel at the entrance off of Routt St. Dog walkers have increased since the building of apartments along Colfax. Having the trash barrel handy makes it convenient for them to easily get rid of their waste bags.

    Tom Cryan asked 14 days ago

    Tom,

    Thank you for this excellent feedback. I will share your comments with the project team. The stairs are a result of the grade change, as an ADA loop is provided in the concept. We agree that all benches should be replaced. 

  • Share Is the demolition already decided? How much the demolition would cost? The house has new roof, so for a while it is safe from elements and can wait for better preservation opportunity. on Facebook Share Is the demolition already decided? How much the demolition would cost? The house has new roof, so for a while it is safe from elements and can wait for better preservation opportunity. on Twitter Share Is the demolition already decided? How much the demolition would cost? The house has new roof, so for a while it is safe from elements and can wait for better preservation opportunity. on Linkedin Email Is the demolition already decided? How much the demolition would cost? The house has new roof, so for a while it is safe from elements and can wait for better preservation opportunity. link

    Is the demolition already decided? How much the demolition would cost? The house has new roof, so for a while it is safe from elements and can wait for better preservation opportunity.

    Maryla asked 14 days ago

    Yes, the Graham House will be removed. As referenced on the project page: Funding is available to make improvements to Graham Park in concert with the family's wishes. Thank you to those who attended the Open House on November 8, 2023. View a summary of resident feedback and the revised concept for the park. Based on public feedback, a thorough assessment of restoration costs by an outside consultant to bring the house to the standards of a public facility, and the limitations on revenue generation, the Graham House will be removed from the park in favor of the proposed concept. Timing of the removal is to be determined. Questions may be submitted using the tools below.

    It will cost approximately $1 million to restore the house to allow for public use once again. There are also annual fees to maintain the house that outweigh the revenue that could be generated. Demolition will cost from $175,000 to $250,000. The park will be restored, ADA access improved, with additional plantings and interpretation. 

    Thank you for your question.

  • Share Just came from the public meeting at the Shepherd of the Hills church where I left a comment card, but neglected to say Thank You! to the Lakewood staff. Appreciated the opportunity to give feedback. You did an excellent job of notifying the community, organizing an efficient way for people to express their opinions, providing extensive information (including pictures/options) and having Lakewood employees on hand to discuss options and give explanations. My husband and I appreciate your work! (Also, nice to see our neighbors :) Sherry Abbott on Facebook Share Just came from the public meeting at the Shepherd of the Hills church where I left a comment card, but neglected to say Thank You! to the Lakewood staff. Appreciated the opportunity to give feedback. You did an excellent job of notifying the community, organizing an efficient way for people to express their opinions, providing extensive information (including pictures/options) and having Lakewood employees on hand to discuss options and give explanations. My husband and I appreciate your work! (Also, nice to see our neighbors :) Sherry Abbott on Twitter Share Just came from the public meeting at the Shepherd of the Hills church where I left a comment card, but neglected to say Thank You! to the Lakewood staff. Appreciated the opportunity to give feedback. You did an excellent job of notifying the community, organizing an efficient way for people to express their opinions, providing extensive information (including pictures/options) and having Lakewood employees on hand to discuss options and give explanations. My husband and I appreciate your work! (Also, nice to see our neighbors :) Sherry Abbott on Linkedin Email Just came from the public meeting at the Shepherd of the Hills church where I left a comment card, but neglected to say Thank You! to the Lakewood staff. Appreciated the opportunity to give feedback. You did an excellent job of notifying the community, organizing an efficient way for people to express their opinions, providing extensive information (including pictures/options) and having Lakewood employees on hand to discuss options and give explanations. My husband and I appreciate your work! (Also, nice to see our neighbors :) Sherry Abbott link

    Just came from the public meeting at the Shepherd of the Hills church where I left a comment card, but neglected to say Thank You! to the Lakewood staff. Appreciated the opportunity to give feedback. You did an excellent job of notifying the community, organizing an efficient way for people to express their opinions, providing extensive information (including pictures/options) and having Lakewood employees on hand to discuss options and give explanations. My husband and I appreciate your work! (Also, nice to see our neighbors :) Sherry Abbott

    Sherry asked 6 months ago

    Thank you again for your kind comments!

Page last updated: 03 May 2024, 07:48 PM