Ask a question
Ask your question here, and city staff will respond within three business days. Questions and answers about this project can be visible to the public.
For general questions and concerns about the city, please visit LakewoodCO.gov/Request, which is the city's online customer service hub available 24 hours a day.
-
Share This isn't a formal question. Just thoughts about future possible incentives for people to upgrade windows, roofs, doors etc. Also, I do not know the codes , or laws but my elderly mother and I live in a comdo. Will this or does this also apply to these type of residential structures. Will you work with associations and rental places as well to make sure these structures are included? A side note, and a thought but unsure about the feasibility. I know the city was conducting emergency trainings. Is there a way to work with neighborhood watch, associations and apartment personnel to get people to go through those emergency preparedness trainings the city has offered? A campaign to get people to sign up. Just some thoughts. on Facebook Share This isn't a formal question. Just thoughts about future possible incentives for people to upgrade windows, roofs, doors etc. Also, I do not know the codes , or laws but my elderly mother and I live in a comdo. Will this or does this also apply to these type of residential structures. Will you work with associations and rental places as well to make sure these structures are included? A side note, and a thought but unsure about the feasibility. I know the city was conducting emergency trainings. Is there a way to work with neighborhood watch, associations and apartment personnel to get people to go through those emergency preparedness trainings the city has offered? A campaign to get people to sign up. Just some thoughts. on Twitter Share This isn't a formal question. Just thoughts about future possible incentives for people to upgrade windows, roofs, doors etc. Also, I do not know the codes , or laws but my elderly mother and I live in a comdo. Will this or does this also apply to these type of residential structures. Will you work with associations and rental places as well to make sure these structures are included? A side note, and a thought but unsure about the feasibility. I know the city was conducting emergency trainings. Is there a way to work with neighborhood watch, associations and apartment personnel to get people to go through those emergency preparedness trainings the city has offered? A campaign to get people to sign up. Just some thoughts. on Linkedin Email This isn't a formal question. Just thoughts about future possible incentives for people to upgrade windows, roofs, doors etc. Also, I do not know the codes , or laws but my elderly mother and I live in a comdo. Will this or does this also apply to these type of residential structures. Will you work with associations and rental places as well to make sure these structures are included? A side note, and a thought but unsure about the feasibility. I know the city was conducting emergency trainings. Is there a way to work with neighborhood watch, associations and apartment personnel to get people to go through those emergency preparedness trainings the city has offered? A campaign to get people to sign up. Just some thoughts. link
This isn't a formal question. Just thoughts about future possible incentives for people to upgrade windows, roofs, doors etc. Also, I do not know the codes , or laws but my elderly mother and I live in a comdo. Will this or does this also apply to these type of residential structures. Will you work with associations and rental places as well to make sure these structures are included? A side note, and a thought but unsure about the feasibility. I know the city was conducting emergency trainings. Is there a way to work with neighborhood watch, associations and apartment personnel to get people to go through those emergency preparedness trainings the city has offered? A campaign to get people to sign up. Just some thoughts.
Janetperez asked about 1 month agoThanks so much for your interest in this project. Regarding your questions, the code will apply to all types of new construction including single-family detached, single-family attached and apartment buildings. As far as existing buildings, the code will also apply for upgrades and repairs under some conditions for items including shingles, windows, and doors.
Our communications team also works regularly to promote the Community Emergency Response Training (CERT) program, which is free training for residents to teach them how to plan for an emergency and trains them in basic disaster response skills, including fire safety. Information about these courses are available at www.LakewoodCO,gov/CERT. When there is a course, information to register is available on our website, weekly newsletters and on social media. We'll pass your suggestion on to the Police Department to include the CERT information in the neighborhood watch program and through their work with apartment managers.
-- The Project Team
-
Share Hello, I am a contractor working with a client on an insurance claim. Right now, her insurance company is covering a little over 25% of vinyl siding on her home. Am I right in my understanding that according to the new Wildfire Resiliency Code, we cannot go back on with vinyl siding? on Facebook Share Hello, I am a contractor working with a client on an insurance claim. Right now, her insurance company is covering a little over 25% of vinyl siding on her home. Am I right in my understanding that according to the new Wildfire Resiliency Code, we cannot go back on with vinyl siding? on Twitter Share Hello, I am a contractor working with a client on an insurance claim. Right now, her insurance company is covering a little over 25% of vinyl siding on her home. Am I right in my understanding that according to the new Wildfire Resiliency Code, we cannot go back on with vinyl siding? on Linkedin Email Hello, I am a contractor working with a client on an insurance claim. Right now, her insurance company is covering a little over 25% of vinyl siding on her home. Am I right in my understanding that according to the new Wildfire Resiliency Code, we cannot go back on with vinyl siding? link
Hello, I am a contractor working with a client on an insurance claim. Right now, her insurance company is covering a little over 25% of vinyl siding on her home. Am I right in my understanding that according to the new Wildfire Resiliency Code, we cannot go back on with vinyl siding?
Jordan asked about 1 month agoTo determine whether vinyl siding can be reinstalled under the new Wildfire Resiliency Code, you first need to verify whether the home is located within a designated Wildland‑Urban Interface (WUI) area and confirm what percentage of the existing siding is being repaired or replaced.
If the property is subject to WUI requirements, the next step is to determine whether the wall assembly will provide a 1‑hour fire‑resistance rating or if the vinyl siding would be installed over non‑combustible sheathing. Depending on these factors, vinyl siding may still be an allowable option, though you may want to consider other economical materials that may involve fewer restrictions as well. Because siding replacement does require a permit in Lakewood, if there is any uncertainty, you can submit the proposed wall section and materials to the Building Department for review, and they will be able to provide more detailed guidance.
-- The Project Team
-
Share Will this plan require Agricultural Ditch to maintain their area to reduce the rick of fire due to their lack of attending to weeds that dry and become fire hazards? Thsnk you. on Facebook Share Will this plan require Agricultural Ditch to maintain their area to reduce the rick of fire due to their lack of attending to weeds that dry and become fire hazards? Thsnk you. on Twitter Share Will this plan require Agricultural Ditch to maintain their area to reduce the rick of fire due to their lack of attending to weeds that dry and become fire hazards? Thsnk you. on Linkedin Email Will this plan require Agricultural Ditch to maintain their area to reduce the rick of fire due to their lack of attending to weeds that dry and become fire hazards? Thsnk you. link
Will this plan require Agricultural Ditch to maintain their area to reduce the rick of fire due to their lack of attending to weeds that dry and become fire hazards? Thsnk you.
COnative asked about 1 month agoThanks for your interest in this project. We're working with the staff knowledgeable about the Ag Ditch operations to get you some information on this.
-- The Project Team
Thanks for your patience with us getting this information to you. Here is the information that addresses your question:
The proposed code does not require mitigation from entities such as the Agricultural Ditch Company. These organizations are not considered responsible parties for implementing vegetation management or wildfire‑mitigation activities under the current draft. Their facilities may fall within mapped WUI areas, but the intent of the code is to focus requirements on property owners and development activities that directly influence structure ignition potential, not on utility or ditch companies whose operations do not typically involve maintainable structures or occupiable facilities.
-
Share You now have two WUI maps. One from Jeffco. One from Lakewood with three types of interfaces. They are not the same. Which one is applicable? Of the applicable one, when was it last updated? Does it reflect current development (e.g., between Alameda -C470- Morrison road)? If not, when will it be updated to reflect the changes from green space to housing development? The referenced area has evolved from open space to almost 100% housing with major road and a fire station in its boundaries. on Facebook Share You now have two WUI maps. One from Jeffco. One from Lakewood with three types of interfaces. They are not the same. Which one is applicable? Of the applicable one, when was it last updated? Does it reflect current development (e.g., between Alameda -C470- Morrison road)? If not, when will it be updated to reflect the changes from green space to housing development? The referenced area has evolved from open space to almost 100% housing with major road and a fire station in its boundaries. on Twitter Share You now have two WUI maps. One from Jeffco. One from Lakewood with three types of interfaces. They are not the same. Which one is applicable? Of the applicable one, when was it last updated? Does it reflect current development (e.g., between Alameda -C470- Morrison road)? If not, when will it be updated to reflect the changes from green space to housing development? The referenced area has evolved from open space to almost 100% housing with major road and a fire station in its boundaries. on Linkedin Email You now have two WUI maps. One from Jeffco. One from Lakewood with three types of interfaces. They are not the same. Which one is applicable? Of the applicable one, when was it last updated? Does it reflect current development (e.g., between Alameda -C470- Morrison road)? If not, when will it be updated to reflect the changes from green space to housing development? The referenced area has evolved from open space to almost 100% housing with major road and a fire station in its boundaries. link
You now have two WUI maps. One from Jeffco. One from Lakewood with three types of interfaces. They are not the same. Which one is applicable? Of the applicable one, when was it last updated? Does it reflect current development (e.g., between Alameda -C470- Morrison road)? If not, when will it be updated to reflect the changes from green space to housing development? The referenced area has evolved from open space to almost 100% housing with major road and a fire station in its boundaries.
rickhalbach asked about 1 month agoRick -- Thanks for your interest in this project. Here is the information regarding your questions:
Because of state deadlines and input received during the new code process, the map has undergone some modification. Lakewood’s WUI map, the version that identifies two Interface areas and one Intermix area, is the most recent and is the map currently proposed for adoption. The WUI boundaries are based on the developed conditions that existed at the time of Jefferson County’s 2024 update.
-- The Project Team
-
Share You now have defined 3 types of WUI, how does the code specifically apply to each type? on Facebook Share You now have defined 3 types of WUI, how does the code specifically apply to each type? on Twitter Share You now have defined 3 types of WUI, how does the code specifically apply to each type? on Linkedin Email You now have defined 3 types of WUI, how does the code specifically apply to each type? link
You now have defined 3 types of WUI, how does the code specifically apply to each type?
rickhalbach asked about 1 month agoRick -- I know you've asked this question in a couple of different ways and also outside this question section. We're working to get information on this, but the staff member with the expertise on this has been tied up. Please stay tuned for follow-up information.
-- The Project Team
Rick -- Here is the information that addresses your question:
Lakewood’s WUI plan identifies three area types: Intermix, Interface Interior, and Interface Perimeter. Intermix areas contain a blend of development and wildland vegetation, while the two Interface zones represent developed areas that border wildland fuels. Under the code, the Interface Interior and Interface Perimeter zones are treated the same and follow identical construction and defensible‑space standards, whereas the Intermix zone carries additional requirements because its configuration presents a higher wildfire exposure.
-- The Project Team
-
Share What steps are being taken for fire mitigation along Bear Creek Trail specifically from Wadsworth to Estes? Thank you. on Facebook Share What steps are being taken for fire mitigation along Bear Creek Trail specifically from Wadsworth to Estes? Thank you. on Twitter Share What steps are being taken for fire mitigation along Bear Creek Trail specifically from Wadsworth to Estes? Thank you. on Linkedin Email What steps are being taken for fire mitigation along Bear Creek Trail specifically from Wadsworth to Estes? Thank you. link
What steps are being taken for fire mitigation along Bear Creek Trail specifically from Wadsworth to Estes? Thank you.
BMac2771 asked about 1 month agoGood afternoon,
The City developed an Open Space Fire Mitigation Plan in 2022 in conjunction with West Metro Fire Rescue. This plan utilizes the WMFR Community Wildfire Protection Plan Update (CWPP) and identifies hazard areas in the district, priority areas for hazardous fuel reduction treatments, and measures to reduce the ignitability of structures throughout the study area.
Within Lakewood, the areas commonly referred to as Green Mountain and Green Mountain Ravines received a 'High' Hazard Rating, the second highest possible ranking. Recognizing the potential risks in the Lakewood Wildland Urban Interface (WUI), Lakewood staff have partnered with West Metro Fire to evaluate wildland fire risk and fuels along open space boundaries that abut to private property and to develop reasonable strategies to mitigate fire risk while preserving open space values. This plan provides a guideline for this assessment and initial work activities.Prioritized areas included in the plan include the Green Mountain and Green Mountain Ravines areas, with the Bear Creek Greenbelt lower in priority based on identified hazards. Lakewood parks staff do monitor the Bear Creek Greenbelt and take corrective actions as needed but focus on the identified hazard locations for immediate mitigation.
-- The Project Team -
Share Maybe question, maybe comment. Last week I was a bit concerned about the communication about vegetation removal near homes in high-risk areas. It would be very easy to read that and conclude this will mandate clear-cutting virtually all trees from fairly dense row-house properties, notably in Green Mountain but in other similarly high-risk areas. Last year read all the CWPPs in Jefferson County (!) and I am nearly certain at least the one in my area and possibly all of them specified that (paraphrased here) defensible space becomes impossible in urban neighborhoods. Which seems to contradict the communication we received last week calling for (as I recall) 4' of nothing flammable around the perimeter of a home and a far greater buffer (50'? 30'?) of no trees. Future communications should clarify the City of Lakewood position on this point. on Facebook Share Maybe question, maybe comment. Last week I was a bit concerned about the communication about vegetation removal near homes in high-risk areas. It would be very easy to read that and conclude this will mandate clear-cutting virtually all trees from fairly dense row-house properties, notably in Green Mountain but in other similarly high-risk areas. Last year read all the CWPPs in Jefferson County (!) and I am nearly certain at least the one in my area and possibly all of them specified that (paraphrased here) defensible space becomes impossible in urban neighborhoods. Which seems to contradict the communication we received last week calling for (as I recall) 4' of nothing flammable around the perimeter of a home and a far greater buffer (50'? 30'?) of no trees. Future communications should clarify the City of Lakewood position on this point. on Twitter Share Maybe question, maybe comment. Last week I was a bit concerned about the communication about vegetation removal near homes in high-risk areas. It would be very easy to read that and conclude this will mandate clear-cutting virtually all trees from fairly dense row-house properties, notably in Green Mountain but in other similarly high-risk areas. Last year read all the CWPPs in Jefferson County (!) and I am nearly certain at least the one in my area and possibly all of them specified that (paraphrased here) defensible space becomes impossible in urban neighborhoods. Which seems to contradict the communication we received last week calling for (as I recall) 4' of nothing flammable around the perimeter of a home and a far greater buffer (50'? 30'?) of no trees. Future communications should clarify the City of Lakewood position on this point. on Linkedin Email Maybe question, maybe comment. Last week I was a bit concerned about the communication about vegetation removal near homes in high-risk areas. It would be very easy to read that and conclude this will mandate clear-cutting virtually all trees from fairly dense row-house properties, notably in Green Mountain but in other similarly high-risk areas. Last year read all the CWPPs in Jefferson County (!) and I am nearly certain at least the one in my area and possibly all of them specified that (paraphrased here) defensible space becomes impossible in urban neighborhoods. Which seems to contradict the communication we received last week calling for (as I recall) 4' of nothing flammable around the perimeter of a home and a far greater buffer (50'? 30'?) of no trees. Future communications should clarify the City of Lakewood position on this point. link
Maybe question, maybe comment. Last week I was a bit concerned about the communication about vegetation removal near homes in high-risk areas. It would be very easy to read that and conclude this will mandate clear-cutting virtually all trees from fairly dense row-house properties, notably in Green Mountain but in other similarly high-risk areas. Last year read all the CWPPs in Jefferson County (!) and I am nearly certain at least the one in my area and possibly all of them specified that (paraphrased here) defensible space becomes impossible in urban neighborhoods. Which seems to contradict the communication we received last week calling for (as I recall) 4' of nothing flammable around the perimeter of a home and a far greater buffer (50'? 30'?) of no trees. Future communications should clarify the City of Lakewood position on this point.
Brian2019 asked about 1 month agoGood morning,
We appreciate your familiarity with the Community Wildfire Protection Plans and the thoughtful perspective you bring to this issue.
To help clarify, the City of Lakewood is not requiring or promoting the clear cutting of trees in urban neighborhoods. The defensible space zones described in our outreach align with nationally recognized standards, but they also acknowledge the unique limitations of smaller lots and dense urban development.
A few key points may help address the confusion:
• The Immediate Zone (0–5 feet) around a structure is the area where changes are most effective and also the easiest to regulate. This zone should be kept free of combustible materials, including flammable vegetation.
• The Intermediate Zone (5–30 feet) is more challenging to implement fully in small lot neighborhoods due to lot size constraints and land ownership boundaries. This zone does prohibit juniper bushes because of their high flammability, but it does not prohibit trees.
• Existing trees are allowed, provided tree branches remain at least 10 feet from structures.
• There is no mandate to remove or clear cut trees anywhere in these requirements.
• If a property owner disagrees with a code official’s determination — including vegetation requirements — the City provides an appeal process that the property owner may initiate.
We recognize that defensible space guidance developed for rural or semi rural environments can sound contradictory when applied in dense urban neighborhoods. Future communications will more explicitly distinguish between what is recommended, what is feasible in urban conditions, and what the City actually requires. Thank you.
-- The Project Team -
Share Most of my home's landscaping was carefully planned by the previous owner - a late, well-known landscape architect with the National Park Service. It's one of the main reasons why I purchased the home. The previous owner already added an addition to the house and it has carefully planned seasonal sun and shade via mature trees, some of which whose trunks are 5-6 ft from the house. I've been planning and saving to do a major interior renovation on this room. Some windows will be replaced. I am very concerned about what this new code means for my mature trees. How does the proposed code apply in this case? I've spent a lot of money maintaining my trees and would be devastated to lose any of them. on Facebook Share Most of my home's landscaping was carefully planned by the previous owner - a late, well-known landscape architect with the National Park Service. It's one of the main reasons why I purchased the home. The previous owner already added an addition to the house and it has carefully planned seasonal sun and shade via mature trees, some of which whose trunks are 5-6 ft from the house. I've been planning and saving to do a major interior renovation on this room. Some windows will be replaced. I am very concerned about what this new code means for my mature trees. How does the proposed code apply in this case? I've spent a lot of money maintaining my trees and would be devastated to lose any of them. on Twitter Share Most of my home's landscaping was carefully planned by the previous owner - a late, well-known landscape architect with the National Park Service. It's one of the main reasons why I purchased the home. The previous owner already added an addition to the house and it has carefully planned seasonal sun and shade via mature trees, some of which whose trunks are 5-6 ft from the house. I've been planning and saving to do a major interior renovation on this room. Some windows will be replaced. I am very concerned about what this new code means for my mature trees. How does the proposed code apply in this case? I've spent a lot of money maintaining my trees and would be devastated to lose any of them. on Linkedin Email Most of my home's landscaping was carefully planned by the previous owner - a late, well-known landscape architect with the National Park Service. It's one of the main reasons why I purchased the home. The previous owner already added an addition to the house and it has carefully planned seasonal sun and shade via mature trees, some of which whose trunks are 5-6 ft from the house. I've been planning and saving to do a major interior renovation on this room. Some windows will be replaced. I am very concerned about what this new code means for my mature trees. How does the proposed code apply in this case? I've spent a lot of money maintaining my trees and would be devastated to lose any of them. link
Most of my home's landscaping was carefully planned by the previous owner - a late, well-known landscape architect with the National Park Service. It's one of the main reasons why I purchased the home. The previous owner already added an addition to the house and it has carefully planned seasonal sun and shade via mature trees, some of which whose trunks are 5-6 ft from the house. I've been planning and saving to do a major interior renovation on this room. Some windows will be replaced. I am very concerned about what this new code means for my mature trees. How does the proposed code apply in this case? I've spent a lot of money maintaining my trees and would be devastated to lose any of them.
TRexLives999 asked about 1 month agoGood morning,
Interior renovations, even if they include replacing widows, or previously completed building additions should not trigger mitigation requirements to the existing landscaping. If the code is adopted, I would encourage you to include the building department in your early planning. That way you will be able to get specific answers to your questions before committing significant time and money on design.
-- The Project Team -
Share Possibly a request for information. Thanks to hail hazards, virtually all rooftops in the area have been replaced at least once in recent years. Roofing companies seemed to be 'all-in' on replacing traditional attic vent-pipes or soffit vents with ridge vents. Are these not a very effective conduit of flying embers being driven by high winds to land on a rooftop, roll up to the ridge vent, and float down directly into our attics? Has the ridge-vent building code feature been considered w/ regard to wildfire? Could it be? on Facebook Share Possibly a request for information. Thanks to hail hazards, virtually all rooftops in the area have been replaced at least once in recent years. Roofing companies seemed to be 'all-in' on replacing traditional attic vent-pipes or soffit vents with ridge vents. Are these not a very effective conduit of flying embers being driven by high winds to land on a rooftop, roll up to the ridge vent, and float down directly into our attics? Has the ridge-vent building code feature been considered w/ regard to wildfire? Could it be? on Twitter Share Possibly a request for information. Thanks to hail hazards, virtually all rooftops in the area have been replaced at least once in recent years. Roofing companies seemed to be 'all-in' on replacing traditional attic vent-pipes or soffit vents with ridge vents. Are these not a very effective conduit of flying embers being driven by high winds to land on a rooftop, roll up to the ridge vent, and float down directly into our attics? Has the ridge-vent building code feature been considered w/ regard to wildfire? Could it be? on Linkedin Email Possibly a request for information. Thanks to hail hazards, virtually all rooftops in the area have been replaced at least once in recent years. Roofing companies seemed to be 'all-in' on replacing traditional attic vent-pipes or soffit vents with ridge vents. Are these not a very effective conduit of flying embers being driven by high winds to land on a rooftop, roll up to the ridge vent, and float down directly into our attics? Has the ridge-vent building code feature been considered w/ regard to wildfire? Could it be? link
Possibly a request for information. Thanks to hail hazards, virtually all rooftops in the area have been replaced at least once in recent years. Roofing companies seemed to be 'all-in' on replacing traditional attic vent-pipes or soffit vents with ridge vents. Are these not a very effective conduit of flying embers being driven by high winds to land on a rooftop, roll up to the ridge vent, and float down directly into our attics? Has the ridge-vent building code feature been considered w/ regard to wildfire? Could it be?
Brian2019 asked about 1 month agoGood morning,
Vents are covered in the new code. The specific vent products will need to conform with the rating requirements stated in the code.
-- The Project Team -
Share You assert that “A mandate by the state requires Lakewood to adopt wildfire resiliency standards. This is not optional. Because this adoption is mandated by the State of Colorado.” Lakewood does have other options available if it chooses to utilize them. Governor Jared Polis is attempting to influence housing policies in every Colorado community, disregarding the autonomy of home-rule cities. Why has Lakewood chosen to comply with Polis’s demands rather than safeguard our home-rule property rights? In contrast, six home-rule cities assert that Colorado has exceeded its authority and have filed a lawsuit against Colorado in the Denver District Court to challenge the constitutionality of the newly enacted housing statutes. Why is Lakewood expediting the adoption of wildfire resiliency code before the aforementioned court challenge is resolved? If the court determines that the State has exceeded its authority, how will Lakewood proceed with its wildfire resiliency code? on Facebook Share You assert that “A mandate by the state requires Lakewood to adopt wildfire resiliency standards. This is not optional. Because this adoption is mandated by the State of Colorado.” Lakewood does have other options available if it chooses to utilize them. Governor Jared Polis is attempting to influence housing policies in every Colorado community, disregarding the autonomy of home-rule cities. Why has Lakewood chosen to comply with Polis’s demands rather than safeguard our home-rule property rights? In contrast, six home-rule cities assert that Colorado has exceeded its authority and have filed a lawsuit against Colorado in the Denver District Court to challenge the constitutionality of the newly enacted housing statutes. Why is Lakewood expediting the adoption of wildfire resiliency code before the aforementioned court challenge is resolved? If the court determines that the State has exceeded its authority, how will Lakewood proceed with its wildfire resiliency code? on Twitter Share You assert that “A mandate by the state requires Lakewood to adopt wildfire resiliency standards. This is not optional. Because this adoption is mandated by the State of Colorado.” Lakewood does have other options available if it chooses to utilize them. Governor Jared Polis is attempting to influence housing policies in every Colorado community, disregarding the autonomy of home-rule cities. Why has Lakewood chosen to comply with Polis’s demands rather than safeguard our home-rule property rights? In contrast, six home-rule cities assert that Colorado has exceeded its authority and have filed a lawsuit against Colorado in the Denver District Court to challenge the constitutionality of the newly enacted housing statutes. Why is Lakewood expediting the adoption of wildfire resiliency code before the aforementioned court challenge is resolved? If the court determines that the State has exceeded its authority, how will Lakewood proceed with its wildfire resiliency code? on Linkedin Email You assert that “A mandate by the state requires Lakewood to adopt wildfire resiliency standards. This is not optional. Because this adoption is mandated by the State of Colorado.” Lakewood does have other options available if it chooses to utilize them. Governor Jared Polis is attempting to influence housing policies in every Colorado community, disregarding the autonomy of home-rule cities. Why has Lakewood chosen to comply with Polis’s demands rather than safeguard our home-rule property rights? In contrast, six home-rule cities assert that Colorado has exceeded its authority and have filed a lawsuit against Colorado in the Denver District Court to challenge the constitutionality of the newly enacted housing statutes. Why is Lakewood expediting the adoption of wildfire resiliency code before the aforementioned court challenge is resolved? If the court determines that the State has exceeded its authority, how will Lakewood proceed with its wildfire resiliency code? link
You assert that “A mandate by the state requires Lakewood to adopt wildfire resiliency standards. This is not optional. Because this adoption is mandated by the State of Colorado.” Lakewood does have other options available if it chooses to utilize them. Governor Jared Polis is attempting to influence housing policies in every Colorado community, disregarding the autonomy of home-rule cities. Why has Lakewood chosen to comply with Polis’s demands rather than safeguard our home-rule property rights? In contrast, six home-rule cities assert that Colorado has exceeded its authority and have filed a lawsuit against Colorado in the Denver District Court to challenge the constitutionality of the newly enacted housing statutes. Why is Lakewood expediting the adoption of wildfire resiliency code before the aforementioned court challenge is resolved? If the court determines that the State has exceeded its authority, how will Lakewood proceed with its wildfire resiliency code?
JohnM asked about 2 months agoJohn -- We appreciate your interest in this project and you providing your comments, which are largely political in nature and outside the scope of this project.
-- The Project Team
Thank you for your contribution!
Help us reach out to more people in the community
Share this with family and friends